I smplest we
humphard
21/8/56
Mr Sidelotham
The file containing "Jacks Digest" has her destroyed but a copy of
It helps a little but not much a under
the digest is awsite, it helps.
on page
3
item (viii) it
appears
that the for in Cuncil
"
"Austin
already
has authority to wall land" without auction in districts where the for in Council decides that auction is considered undenisable..."
the byal Adviser sus no
Muck, Anwer,
shoulde
say
"
abjectivis inde mins of 9/8 4 11/8. I do not
that no Grow Land grants med de refered to
He 8 of 8. but we may approve the digional of such lands by proate treaty,
housing
motead of auction, for the purpose of apprehensive schemes for workers,
? As in aff.
HAMall
25/2
I mentioned this to Sir K. Roberts-Wray before he went on leave and he was inclined to share my doubts.
57
He thought, however, that we might say something to the effect that the Secretary of State agrees that until further notice it will be unnecessary for the Governor to seek the Secretary of State's authority for the disposal of Crown Lands by private treaty for comprehensive workers' housing schemes; that the Secretary of State would wish the Governor to bring the matter up for further consideration in five years' time that in the neatime eould be grateful if he could be furnished comuwith a statement of such grants as have been made by private treaty for comprehensive workers' housing schemes. (This is a matter which washould do will lo
Keeps wi brush with
+
하
5/h kome accordingly pt.
JBS.
27. 8. 1951.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.